Redskins running back James Davis did not play in the preseason game against the Steelers. What he did today may ensure that he doesn't play in any NFL games ever again.
Davis has some talent and there was some buzz that the Redskins may have found a keeper when they signed him to a practice squad contract in midseason last year. After a rash of injuries at the running back position, they brought him up to the active roster. Davis appeared in three games but issues in pass protection landed him on the inactive list for the last several weeks of the season.
Davis has done nothing to distinguish himself in practice and it was not much of a surprise when he did not play against the Steelers. There are reports that the expressed his unhappiness over his lack of playing time to a coach during a meeting on Sunday.
That part is unclear. What is clear is that he did not show up at Redskins Park for practice today. Mike Shanahan said that the absence was unexcused and that Davis was "missing in action."
Bad career move, James.
Remember when Jim Riggleman walked out as manager of the Nationals? Yeah, that is working out well for him. He is now a scout for the Giants and it is unlikely that he will ever manage again. Simply put, nobody likes a quitter, no matter how justified his departure may have been.
It was unlikely that anything that Davis could have done would have help him make the Redskins' roster. He was the last-string running back on the depth chart, behind even rookie free agent Shaun Draughn. But by walking out, he certainly scared off a number of teams that might have given him a shot somewhere down the line. And when you are one of those players on the edge, having any teams cross you off their lists of potential hires is not a good omen for your future.
Certainly, Davis' frustration level had to be high--again, he does have some ability--but he needed to stick with it until he was released.

I think James Davis did the best thing possible, leaving the team to prevent more distractions, we dont need drama in this team anymore, he was not like Haynesworth.
Posted by: Luqman Sh-Hersi | Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 06:50 PM
Not necessarily fair (coaches do it to players all the time), but quite accurate. Riggleman is one of my favorites in baseball, can't say the same for any baseball team in DC history...It's a good thing DC has the Redskins.
Posted by: Sports Scatter | Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 07:14 PM
For a start, then, I’m thinking: protected refuges. The main thing is to get these people breeding again, but we could also put them in zoos to raise awareness of their plight, as well as remind people of the grave danger they pose to the fabric of American society, blah, blah, etc. Maybe we could pay for it by getting a penny from every dollar spent at Starbucks or maybe Chavez has some petro-dollars he can spare. Bono should be gotten on board, stat. Riots would also be a good way to raise awareness; perhaps we could have special protected days where they would be allowed to run free (also good for tourism). Once a stable minimal breeding population is established, we could build some government run institutions of higher learning to indoctrinate them and create some “unions” of organized labor to keep the workers in touch with the socialist propaganda and social support that they’ll need if they’re to survive in the wild. At some point in the future, we’ll have to tag, collar, and track them, so we can try to colonize parts of the country where overhunting and resource degradation has completely eliminated them. But we’ve got plenty of time to work out those details; that’s a long way off.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Outlet | Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:17 PM
This last year we demonstrated that we can keep 21 trees watered and in good health, even during a horrible drought. That has won us credibility with TreeFolks, and we think they will give us trees despite no fixed irrigation. The thing that will make or break the project is WATER. The number of trees we can plant is directly related to our watering plan, which will consist of volunteer watering and paying area students to water.
Posted by: Puma Outlet Store | Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 02:22 AM
"From my purview over the past 30 years, there has been a clear distinction between the CIO and CMO," noted Lisa. "And in many regards it has been an arm wrestle of a relationship. I'm in my fourth gig as a CMO; in the past, the requests and requirements that marketing has for technology have fallen very far down the list from the requests of sales and finance and other functions seen as revenue-critical. At the same time, marketing was very stove-piped, and collaboration with IT was nonexistent."
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Shoes | Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 05:05 AM