MORE NEWS



STAY IN TOUCH

« Meriweather to miss 4 more weeks | Main | Grading the Redskins: Good start, rocky finish for defense »

Tuesday, October 09, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a015432d86661970c017c3269e1b1970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Need to Know: Redskins pass defense historically bad:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

eks74072

Pass D is awful but total yards is not the best measure. Yards per play and yards per drive are better and while we are near the bottom in those, we are not at the bottom, just for this year. We have given up the most 40 yard plays. As far as historically bad, I disagree there. If Rex was still QB, other teams would be running in the second half knowing we were down and couldn't catch up, and the defense would look adequate, as it did last year until the offense started scoring at the end of the year.

Does anyone remember 2006? Now that was closer to historically bad pass defense, and proved it all season. They were 31st in yards per drive, last in touchdowns per drive, and worst rated in both defense and pass defense by the advanced stats at Football Outsiders.

This team can be merely below average if they give up the cover-0 craziness. The Steelers-style defense is about creating pressure with blitzes coming from anywhere, not by completely selling out and rushing everyone.

The performance against Atlanta, overall, has to be considered very good. They netted 17 points against our defense after averaging only 5.2 yards per play, 6.4 per pass (both below average) and 2 points per drive. We made a top offense look merely decent. True, they owned third down but it didn't net them all that much. Amazing how you can contain the other team's score when you don't give up multiple 30 yard plays!

The comments to this entry are closed.